Skip to content

Issues: AxonFramework/AxonFramework

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
87 Open 1,081 Closed
87 Open 1,081 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Label
Filter by label
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Support Synthetic Flows/Tests Priority 4: Would Lowest priority. Would-be-nice to include issues when time allows it. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#2950 opened Dec 22, 2023 by vab2048
1 🎉 1
Make forwarding mode configurable for entire Aggregate instead of configuring for each AggregateMember Priority 4: Would Lowest priority. Would-be-nice to include issues when time allows it. Type: Enhancement Use to signal an issue enhances an already existing feature of the project.
#474 opened Jan 11, 2018 by marleinevankampen
Builder pattern improvements Priority 3: Could Low priority. Issues that are nice to have but have a straightforward workaround. Type: Enhancement Use to signal an issue enhances an already existing feature of the project.
#902 opened Nov 20, 2018 by m1l4n54v1c
2
Allow registration of Upcasters on all components that do serialization of messages Priority 2: Should High priority. Ideally, these issues are part of the release they’re assigned to. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#746 opened Sep 3, 2018 by abuijze
4
Projection Testing Priority 2: Should High priority. Ideally, these issues are part of the release they’re assigned to. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#729 opened Aug 23, 2018 by m1l4n54v1c
8
Alias/Business Name for an Event Priority 2: Should High priority. Ideally, these issues are part of the release they’re assigned to. Type: Enhancement Use to signal an issue enhances an already existing feature of the project.
#722 opened Aug 20, 2018 by m1l4n54v1c
13
Custom Scopes Priority 3: Could Low priority. Issues that are nice to have but have a straightforward workaround. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#626 opened Jun 21, 2018 by m1l4n54v1c
Cache improvements Epic
#641 opened Jul 3, 2018 by m1l4n54v1c
TinyLFU-based caching policy Priority 3: Could Low priority. Issues that are nice to have but have a straightforward workaround. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#518 opened Feb 27, 2018 by ben-manes
Introduce Federated/Hierarchical CommandBus Priority 3: Could Low priority. Issues that are nice to have but have a straightforward workaround. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#1092 opened May 15, 2019 by smcvb
Consistency gap in conjunction with state-stored aggregates Status: Under Discussion Use to signal that the issue in question is being discussed.
#1103 opened May 27, 2019 by OLibutzki
8
State-Stored Aggregate: AggregateIdentifier has to be String Priority 3: Could Low priority. Issues that are nice to have but have a straightforward workaround. Type: Enhancement Use to signal an issue enhances an already existing feature of the project.
#1062 opened Apr 18, 2019 by OLibutzki
@abuijze @smcvb
10
Ordering of event handler instance/type group selectors Priority 3: Could Low priority. Issues that are nice to have but have a straightforward workaround. Type: Enhancement Use to signal an issue enhances an already existing feature of the project.
#1028 opened Mar 14, 2019 by m1l4n54v1c
Granular Axon Starter "use case" selection Priority 3: Could Low priority. Issues that are nice to have but have a straightforward workaround. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#1256 opened Oct 29, 2019 by jangalinski
@smcvb
10
Allow Map for ResponseType of a Query Priority 4: Would Lowest priority. Would-be-nice to include issues when time allows it. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#1257 opened Nov 1, 2019 by Sam-Kruglov
1
Support SpEL on an @ProcessingGroup annotation equivalent Priority 4: Would Lowest priority. Would-be-nice to include issues when time allows it. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#1266 opened Nov 6, 2019 by jangalinski
3
Provide SQL for all Entities Ideal for Contribution Priority 4: Would Lowest priority. Would-be-nice to include issues when time allows it. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#1258 opened Nov 2, 2019 by jangalinski
8
Dynamic Configuration Changes Priority 4: Would Lowest priority. Would-be-nice to include issues when time allows it. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#1276 opened Nov 26, 2019 by m1l4n54v1c
Improve support for hierarchical Spring application contexts Epic
#1341 opened Feb 11, 2020 by OLibutzki
Improve support for a local event store Priority 2: Should High priority. Ideally, these issues are part of the release they’re assigned to. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#1342 opened Feb 11, 2020 by OLibutzki
6
QueryUpdateEmitter should return a number of affected queries Priority 3: Could Low priority. Issues that are nice to have but have a straightforward workaround. Status: Under Discussion Use to signal that the issue in question is being discussed. Type: Enhancement Use to signal an issue enhances an already existing feature of the project.
#1470 opened Jul 22, 2020 by m1l4n54v1c
@smcvb
1
BufferingQueryUpdateEmitter Priority 3: Could Low priority. Issues that are nice to have but have a straightforward workaround. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#1471 opened Jul 22, 2020 by m1l4n54v1c
Provide a fluent API for assertions Priority 3: Could Low priority. Issues that are nice to have but have a straightforward workaround. Status: Under Discussion Use to signal that the issue in question is being discussed. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#1476 opened Jul 27, 2020 by OLibutzki
Interceptor list Spring auto configuration Priority 4: Would Lowest priority. Would-be-nice to include issues when time allows it. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
#1422 opened Apr 24, 2020 by smcvb
3
Logging Suggestion Priority 4: Would Lowest priority. Would-be-nice to include issues when time allows it. Type: Enhancement Use to signal an issue enhances an already existing feature of the project.
#1424 opened Apr 28, 2020 by Sam-Kruglov
@smcvb
4
ProTip! What’s not been updated in a month: updated:<2024-04-10.